<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Strategery</title>
	<atom:link href="http://brewingthoughts.com/blog/archives/2005/10/04/strategery/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://brewingthoughts.com/blog/archives/2005/10/04/strategery/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 06:50:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joseph</title>
		<link>http://brewingthoughts.com/blog/archives/2005/10/04/strategery/#comment-40</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2005 04:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brewingthoughts.com/blog/?p=31#comment-40</guid>
		<description>Two things.

First, Bush is always smarter than people give him credit for.  Today he accidentally said, "electricionist."  Oops.  But things are always happening in his head, even if his words fail him.  I am not a Bushie (I had high hopes of GWB slashing spending on all fronts) and I recognize this.

Second, what's-her-name's lack of official Constitutional experience is refreshing.  SC opinions should be written in lay langauge.  I love the SC and studying it.  It amazes me.  I love how the nine justices argue and come out with a majority and dissenting opinion.  A quote-unquote outsider would do us all good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two things.</p>
<p>First, Bush is always smarter than people give him credit for.  Today he accidentally said, &#8220;electricionist.&#8221;  Oops.  But things are always happening in his head, even if his words fail him.  I am not a Bushie (I had high hopes of GWB slashing spending on all fronts) and I recognize this.</p>
<p>Second, what&#8217;s-her-name&#8217;s lack of official Constitutional experience is refreshing.  SC opinions should be written in lay langauge.  I love the SC and studying it.  It amazes me.  I love how the nine justices argue and come out with a majority and dissenting opinion.  A quote-unquote outsider would do us all good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
